

Title | Posted |
---|---|
"Beached" or <em>half pay</em> officers | Nov 2002 |
Cathy Montaigne's wealth | Jun 2005 |
Admiral Hemphil and <em>Fearless'</em> deployment | Aug 2004 |
Manticoran Admiralty | Nov 2002 |
Does the Manticoran Peerage allow Proxy Voting | Dec 2002 |
Manticoran Peerage seating | Nov 2002 |
Manticore's relationship with Beowulf | Dec 2005 |
Pre-war alliance strategy | Feb 2007 |
Power of the Manticoran Monarchy | Dec 2005 |
Why doesn't Elizabeth <em>pack</em> the Lords? | Dec 2002 |
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Why Are Starships Symmetrical? The question of why ships aren't designed with separate broadsides optimized for different types of combat -- that is, missile-range combat as opposed to energy-range combat -- has emerged once again. Do you want to comment on this one at all?
Symmetrical Broadsides. No, I don't want to comment on this. I've done it before, and the statements I made then still apply. Indeed, they've become even more relevant in an era in which broadside missile tubes are becoming less and less significant for major combatants and the need for missile defenses has never been greater. Asymmetrical broadsides would be a bad idea.