Archives
| Title | Posted |
|---|---|
| Warp point denial I | Oct 2002 |
| Warp point denial II | Oct 2002 |
| <em>The Great Vanishing Crucian Mystery</em> | Oct 2002 |
| The Terran Federation - partial (high resolution - 157KB) | Oct 2002 |
| ISW 4: The Arachnid War (1) (low resolution - 27KB) | Oct 2002 |
| Colin's mistake | Sep 2004 |
| Mother's recall of surviving Battle Fleet units | Oct 2002 |
| Order of Battle: The Siege of Earth | Nov 2004 |
| Order of Battle: First Clash - The Vanguard | Nov 2004 |
| Order of Battle: The Battle of Zeta Trianguli Australis | Nov 2004 |
Filters
Pearls of Weber
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Asymmetrical broadsides
- Series: Honorverse
- Date: October 22, 2002
Why Are Starships Symmetrical? The question of why ships aren't designed with separate broadsides optimized for different types of combat -- that is, missile-range combat as opposed to energy-range combat -- has emerged once again. Do you want to comment on this one at all?
Symmetrical Broadsides. No, I don't want to comment on this. I've done it before, and the statements I made then still apply. Indeed, they've become even more relevant in an era in which broadside missile tubes are becoming less and less significant for major combatants and the need for missile defenses has never been greater. Asymmetrical broadsides would be a bad idea.
