

Title | Posted |
---|---|
<em>Wayfarer</em>'s cargo doors | Oct 2002 |
The missing figures from the Honorverse CD-release of <em>More Than Honor</em>. | May 2009 |
Reportage of Honor's 'trial' by the Committee of Public Safety | May 2009 |
"Weaknesses" of the SD(P) classes | Oct 2002 |
Wedge geometry | Oct 2002 |
Capital ships and raiding defenses | May 2008 |
Deep-penetration & commerce raiding strategy | Feb 2007 |
Deep-penetration strategy | Feb 2007 |
The Grendelsbane yards vulnerability | Oct 2002 |
Fleet strengths as of 1905 PD | Dec 2004 |
A collection of posts by David Weber containing background information for his stories, collected and generously made available Joe Buckley.
Why Are Starships Symmetrical? The question of why ships aren't designed with separate broadsides optimized for different types of combat -- that is, missile-range combat as opposed to energy-range combat -- has emerged once again. Do you want to comment on this one at all?
Symmetrical Broadsides. No, I don't want to comment on this. I've done it before, and the statements I made then still apply. Indeed, they've become even more relevant in an era in which broadside missile tubes are becoming less and less significant for major combatants and the need for missile defenses has never been greater. Asymmetrical broadsides would be a bad idea.