Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests

Concepts: Today's similarities and differences to the HV

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Concepts: Today's similarities and differences to the HV
Post by penny   » Wed May 28, 2025 3:45 pm

penny
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1527
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2023 11:55 am

Movie: Greyhound :!:

This is Tom Hanks latest movie. It is about what is to become the largest naval battle in the Atlantic. He is the captain of a destroyer named Greyhound, tasked with protecting allied shipping from the unfathomable losses mounting up against German U-boats. This is the Captain’s first mission. Unbelievable!

During the Battle of the Atlantic, over 3500 ships carrying millions of tons of cargo were sunk.

72,000 souls were lost forever.


I was meaning to compare the possible butcher’s bill of the two eras against the crew complement of today’s destroyers, aircraft carriers and freighters.

This thread is inspired by this very good movie, and it is about certain job descriptions, positions and physical locations of an aircraft carrier that carry over into the HV vs those that no longer exist. For instance, there is still a combat information center (CIC) in the HV. I am assuming that aircraft carriers are the closest analogy to Superdreadnoughts in the HV, as Submarines are a dead ringer (pun intended) for Lenny Detweilers. The following concepts seem to have survived in the HV:

Helm
Flag Bridge
Flag Deck
CIC
Bosun
Coxswain???

Not sure about the following:

Conning Tower
Flight Deck
Pimary Flight Control (PriFly)

Anyone like to point out any others that exist, no longer exist or are completely new? Like… coxswain???

Wiki: The “Air Boss” in the Navy refers to two different, yet related, roles: 1) the Commander, Naval Air Forces (CNAF) (also known as the Air Boss) who is the senior leader of Naval Aviation, and 2) the air officer on an aircraft carrier, responsible for overseeing flight operations on board.

1. Commander, Naval Air Forces (CNAF):
Senior Naval Aviation Leader:
This role, often referred to as the “Air Boss,” is the highest-ranking officer in the Navy responsible for all aspects of Naval Aviation.

Responsibilities:
The CNAF oversees the manning, training, and equipping of all Navy aviation assets, ensuring a combat-ready force.

Current CNAF:
Vice Admiral Daniel “Undra” Cheever is the current Commander, Naval Air Forces and Commander, Naval Air Forces, Pacific Fleet.

2. Air Officer (on an aircraft carrier):

Flight Deck Control:

The air officer, often a commander, is responsible for all aspects of flight operations on the carrier, including the hangar deck, flight deck, and airborne aircraft within a 5-nautical mile radius.

Primary Flight Control (PriFly):
The air officer works from PriFly, also known as the tower, where they have a clear view of all aircraft on board and in the immediate airspace.

Permissions and Coordination:
The air officer grants permission for aircraft to take off, land, or operate within the carrier’s control zone. They work with their assistant, the “miniboss,” and other personnel to manage aircraft traffic.

Role in Air Traffic Control:
The air officer acts as a central point of contact for air traffic control, managing communication with aircraft, providing clearances, and guiding aircraft into and out of the carrier’s airspace.



Notes:
I did not know subs launched decoys simulating the sound of impellers.

In the 2020 war film Greyhound, the sound of “over-revving screws” is used to identify and track German U-boats during the Battle of the Atlantic. The movie portrays the use of sonar and hydrophones to detect the presence of U-boats, and the distinctive sound of their propellers, particularly when they are accelerating or “over-revving”, is a key indicator of their presence.

The sound of over-revving screws helps the US Navy destroyers, including the fictional “Greyhound,” locate and potentially engage the U-boats. In the film, the hydrophone operators listen for these sounds to determine the U-boat’s position, speed, and direction.

The scene where the crew of the Greyhound detects the over-revving screws is a tense moment in the film, highlighting the dangerous and constant threat posed by the German submarines during the Battle of the Atlantic.

Destroyers have to maneuver so sonar will be on the right bearing to locate or to relocate a sub.

Will the GA have to do the same? Certainly if they are to get a glimpse of the vulnerable aspect of their stealth. If there is a vulnerable aspect of their stealth. I suggested the same thing in several threads floating about. In response to the many theories that an LD's stealth will be easily burned through by a certain proximity to GR’s sensors. I maintain that sensors ( for the most part) will need to be correctly aimed at the target.

I also suggested quite some time ago that the LDs might be able to emulate the tactic by launching decoys that would simulate a spider drive. :?

Watching the movie, I was reminded of the Navy’s practice to bury the dead at sea. The GA has a habit of recovering pods of allies and enemies alike. It’s the law of the galaxy. But whatever law that compels a navy to pick up enemy pods certainly was not signed by the Malign. And the Malign certainly are aware of the rest of the galaxy’s responsibility to pick up enemy pods. It might not be prudent to pick up MAN pods; they might be bombs and/or other Trojan horses.

The GA certainly won’t pick up pods after news travels about the disgusting tactic, but surely a lot of damage will be done first.
.
.
.

The artist formerly known as cthia.

Now I can talk in the third person.
Top
Re: Concepts: Today's similarities and differences to the HV
Post by penny   » Wed May 28, 2025 4:39 pm

penny
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1527
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2023 11:55 am

Any wet navy personnel know the exact etymology of over-revving screws? I get the over-revving part. But screws? The internet suggests the term comes from the Royal Navy. I can only guess that a propeller turns like a screw?

The LD's equivalent would be when it goes to emergency acceleration, although I doubt that is going to be more detectable.
.
.
.

The artist formerly known as cthia.

Now I can talk in the third person.
Top
Re: Concepts: Today's similarities and differences to the HV
Post by MantiMerchie   » Wed May 28, 2025 4:50 pm

MantiMerchie
Ensign

Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2018 10:08 pm

Flight deck and flight control likely survive for CLACs.

Conning tower likely not.

I don't think we've seen enough about the LD to make a comparison to subs.

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk
Top
Re: Concepts: Today's similarities and differences to the HV
Post by MantiMerchie   » Wed May 28, 2025 4:51 pm

MantiMerchie
Ensign

Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2018 10:08 pm

They probably mean cavitation.

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk
Top
Re: Concepts: Today's similarities and differences to the HV
Post by tlb   » Wed May 28, 2025 5:30 pm

tlb
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4816
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:34 am

penny wrote:Movie: Greyhound : This is Tom Hanks latest movie
penny wrote:I can only guess that a propeller turns like a screw?

Greyhound came out in 2020 and Tom Hanks has done at least seven movies since then.

It was originally called a screw propeller and some of the early attempts look much more like wood screws than the bladed propellers that we know now. The screw propeller finally was developed well enough to be better than the paddle wheel propelled ships of the day.
TUG-OF-WAR between a paddle steamer and a screw-propelled steamer to decide the more effective method of propulsion. In 1845, H.M.S. Rattler, driven by a screw, and H.M.S. Alecto, fitted with paddles, were tried against one another in a spectacular tug-of-war. Although the vessels were of equal size and nominal horse-power, H.M.S. Rattler succeeded in towing her rival at a speed of nearly three knots.


PS: Long range anti-sub aircraft fitted with 10 cm radar brought an end to the German U-boat threat after March 1943.
Top
Re: Concepts: Today's similarities and differences to the HV
Post by penny   » Wed May 28, 2025 6:09 pm

penny
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1527
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2023 11:55 am

MantiMerchie wrote:Flight deck and flight control likely survive for CLACs.

Conning tower likely not.

I don't think we've seen enough about the LD to make a comparison to subs.

Sent from my SM-A516U using Tapatalk


Good point. Closest I could access a similarity is with ACS. Although they are usually civilians. ACS might have some version of a conning tower, inasmuch as the best location for the platform's sensors to see what's coming in or out of the terminus.
.
.
.

The artist formerly known as cthia.

Now I can talk in the third person.
Top
Re: Concepts: Today's similarities and differences to the HV
Post by penny   » Wed May 28, 2025 6:17 pm

penny
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1527
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2023 11:55 am

tlb wrote:
penny wrote:Movie: Greyhound : This is Tom Hanks latest movie
penny wrote:I can only guess that a propeller turns like a screw?

Greyhound came out in 2020 and Tom Hanks has done at least seven movies since then.

It was originally called a screw propeller and some of the early attempts look much more like wood screws than the bladed propellers that we know now. The screw propeller finally was developed well enough to be better than the paddle wheel propelled ships of the day.
TUG-OF-WAR between a paddle steamer and a screw-propelled steamer to decide the more effective method of propulsion. In 1845, H.M.S. Rattler, driven by a screw, and H.M.S. Alecto, fitted with paddles, were tried against one another in a spectacular tug-of-war. Although the vessels were of equal size and nominal horse-power, H.M.S. Rattler succeeded in towing her rival at a speed of nearly three knots.


PS: Long range anti-sub aircraft fitted with 10 cm radar brought an end to the German U-boat threat after March 1943.

Thanks for the correction. I edited too much from the original wall of text. I didn't see any of his other movies, but this one thrilled me as much as his other blockbusters.

The long range aircraft were not long ranged enough in this movie at that time. When making trips across the Atlantic to England, there was a point where the convoy was out of range of any air cover from the US or England.

I am also unsure of the effectiveness of the radar then; needing to trace a course back to the launch of the torpedo. And the final scene needed Greyhound to shoot its guns marking the location of the sub. Hollywood. So, dunno about the accuracy of that.
.
.
.

The artist formerly known as cthia.

Now I can talk in the third person.
Top
Re: Concepts: Today's similarities and differences to the HV
Post by penny   » Wed May 28, 2025 6:28 pm

penny
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1527
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2023 11:55 am

The area without air cover was called the "Black Pit."

Even I can guess why. :-)
.
.
.

The artist formerly known as cthia.

Now I can talk in the third person.
Top
Re: Concepts: Today's similarities and differences to the HV
Post by tlb   » Wed May 28, 2025 7:48 pm

tlb
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4816
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:34 am

penny wrote:The long range aircraft were not long ranged enough in this movie at that time. When making trips across the Atlantic to England, there was a point where the convoy was out of range of any air cover from the US or England.

I am also unsure of the effectiveness of the radar then; needing to trace a course back to the launch of the torpedo. And the final scene needed Greyhound to shoot its guns marking the location of the sub. Hollywood. So, dunno about the accuracy of that.

Set in February 1942, the movie Greyhound is based on the book The Good Shepherd by C.S. Forester. The book does show problems with the early radar and sonar.

Artistic license about the submarines in the movie from Wikipedia:
There was no radio that allowed ship to ship communication in them, period. Wolfpack attacks were coordinated from shore, then once they were out of range they attacked convoys individually from every compass point at once.

NO U-Boat in the Kriegsmarine would have been caught dead taunting an enemy destroyer even if they HAD such radios. U-boats were absolutely dependent on stealth for survival, and that was Tempting Fate in a massive way due to Allied radio direction-finding capabilities, even in the framework of the movie, and any Alte that was stupid enough to do it probably would have been launched out of one of his own torpedo tubes.
Top
Re: Concepts: Today's similarities and differences to the HV
Post by EKB   » Wed May 28, 2025 8:11 pm

EKB
Midshipman

Posts: 2
Joined: Sat May 18, 2024 2:22 pm

In a case of science-fiction recursion, "according to Rear Admiral Cal Laning, the idea for a command information center was taken “specifically, consciously, and directly” from the spaceship Directrix in the Lensman novels of E. E. Smith, Ph.D., and influenced by the works of his friend and collaborator Robert Heinlein, a retired American naval officer."
Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combat_in ... evelopment

So the CICs in the Honorverse space navies can trace their ancestry back not just to real-world wet navies, but also through them to those older science fiction stories.
Top

Return to Honorverse