I love At All Costs something fierce! I can read that cavalry charge over and over ad nauseam and still get goose bumps! It was the motivation behind my immensely popular Honor at the Bat.
But so many people dislike the mechanics of it, like kzt. I respect his opinion, people have a right to like what they like, it's human nature. But it leaves me scratching my head. I suppose AAC is the perfect example of needing to ignore an author's literary license so you can keep your eyes focused on the prize.
My sister hates Sci-Fi because "It treats you like you're your mother's biggest dummy."

When I tell her that she misses the forest for the trees, she simply rolls her eyes back at me and asks, "Why do they have to put trees in space where they don't belong?"

At any rate, I'd like to better understand what all the negativity is all about, regarding one of my most favorite reads.
Right off hand, I can recall kzt's ill appreciation of Theodosia Kuzak's handling of Third Fleet. However, the rumor mill has it, that the grapevine said, that Honor was originally supposed to die at the helm of Third Fleet herself, thus, not faring much better than Kuzak.
Now, I don't know why the Honor of the alternate universe wouldn't have Apollo even if she had Third Fleet, because she was certainly MVP by then.
So, kzt, spill the spoiled beans found in AAC.