

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests
I think there's been a minor "Oops" with leatherbound EoH | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
clancy688
Posts: 557
|
|
Top |
Re: I think there's been a minor "Oops" with leatherbound Eo | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
ncwolf
Posts: 154
|
That’s not an “oops” that’s a “yikes”!
Is the whole book like that? |
Top |
Re: I think there's been a minor "Oops" with leatherbound Eo | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
clancy688
Posts: 557
|
Every single page.
|
Top |
Re: I think there's been a minor "Oops" with leatherbound Eo | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Shinohara
Posts: 2
|
I received my copy today and can confirm the issue, looks like it was the entire run.
|
Top |
Re: I think there's been a minor "Oops" with leatherbound Eo | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Direwolf18
Posts: 506
|
Yup same. RFC must be... miffed...
For some reason I think this has happened before? I just can't remember the specifics. Maybe it was a different author. |
Top |
Re: I think there's been a minor "Oops" with leatherbound Eo | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Duckk
Posts: 4201
|
Since the issue has been confirmed, I've posted something on Baen's Bar for Toni Weisskopf to see.
-------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope |
Top |
Re: I think there's been a minor "Oops" with leatherbound Eo | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
pappilon
Posts: 1074
|
So... does that make your books more collectable like postage stamps? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The imagination has to be trained into foresight and empathy. Ursula K. LeGuinn ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
Top |
Re: I think there's been a minor "Oops" with leatherbound Eo | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
ncwolf
Posts: 154
|
To err is human; to really foul things up requires a computer.
|
Top |
Re: I think there's been a minor "Oops" with leatherbound Eo | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Peregrinator
Posts: 179
|
True, computers have a way of magnifying human errors and that is almost certainly what happened here. |
Top |
Re: I think there's been a minor "Oops" with leatherbound Eo | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
aairfccha
Posts: 208
|
That could have happened in the pre-computer time as well if the typesetter had made that mistake when setting the pages (or more likely casting the stereotype) since if you can reuse components like the page header you do just that and set it only once.
|
Top |