

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests
Re: Yet another (crazy) idea. | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Belial666
Posts: 972
|
And that is why whether various expendables such as missiles can be carried outside the ship an important question.
If a cruiser not designed for it could tow entire LACs through hyperspace, then an SD designed for it could potentially tow a lot more. |
Top |
Re: Yet another (crazy) idea. | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Kizarvexis
Posts: 270
|
Not really. The RHN accepted tradeoffs to get a similarly capable LAC as mentioned in the same book. Cmdr Clapp mentions that LAC that tactical officers originally thought about were 30-40 Ktons. But he then starts with a clean sheet of paper for the Cimeterre and saves "...a truly amazing amount of tonnage." So the RHN LACs could be under 30 Ktons as the Manty LACs are under 30 Ktons I believe. Since he gets a LAC "...amazingly close to matching the performance of the Manties' designs. Its less efficient inertial compensator meant its maximum acceleration rate was more sluggish, but it was actually a bit more nimble and maneuverable than the observational data suggested the Manty LACs were." Since accel is a function of size in wedge powered ships, it can not be much different in size. Here is the whole section section on the RHN LACs.
|
Top |
Re: Yet another (crazy) idea. | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
lyonheart
Posts: 4853
|
Hi Belial666,
I believe the textev later in War of Honor, plus AAC and David's posts, puts the Cimeterre at 25,000 tons, with the Alpha and Beta birds closer to 20,000 tons. Since all previous LAC's were generally in the 10-11 KT range or less, and given RFC's condemnation of super or big LAC's in the pearls, I took the 30-40 KT size reference to be an indication of what size the peeps/RHN thought they needed to do the same things they knew the Shrike could, in part simply because we had no textev of any LAC's of such size. The Cimeterre had only 4 days [96 hours] of life support [not 3 weeks] for its 15-25 man crew IIRC, was slower etc than the Shrike/Ferret/Katana, but a vast improvement on all previous LAC's the RHN had ever used. Precisely how many the RHN CLAC's can carry has been of some interest here and at the bar, but RFC has refused to release any further details yet until Hos 2 apparently. RHN CLAC's carry far fewer munitions for their LAC's for less sustained operations than the RMN CLAC's [32,000 or ~12,000 tons besides LAC], so that's an issue to be dealt with by the joint planning board; ie RHN CLAC's possibly used more defensively than RMN AND GSN, though against the SL such defenses aren't so critical, and in new construction etc. If indeed Bolthole stopped building SDP's after the 800th during the war, were hundreds of CLAC's what they built next? ![]() L
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
|
Top |
Re: Yet another (crazy) idea. | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Relax
Posts: 3230
|
PROLOGUE AAC, 1st paragraph 3 Aviary class CLAC's dropped off "nearly" 600 LAC's... ~200. AAC, BoMA, Home Fleet engagement 16 CLAC = just over three thousand RHN LAC's. If it were 225 x 16 it would be 3600 RHN LAC's. Hardly "just over" 3000. He seems to have retconned that 778/3 CLAC's. *Note* I did not look up the Tequila system battle in WoH. 200x30,000 = 6Mton 225x30,000 = 6.75Mton 200x40,000 = 8Mton 225x40,000 = 9Mton ADD SHIP Structure = 2Mton more. In WoH, IIRC it was stated that the RHN CLAC's were built on the same hull tonnage as the SD'Ps. How Honor knew they were the new build. There is no way RHN will shred their acceleration. We have proof multiple times of RHN SDP accelerations. They did not kill their acceleration profile and go with an over tonnage design. Their inertial compensator is worse than the RMN. Total tonnage allowed before roll-off point is lower as well. We can conclude that the max tonnage RHN Aviary Class is around 8-8.5Mton. From that we can conclude the Cimeterres are between 20-40,000 tons. 30,000 seems approximately appropriate. What certainly is true at least by the time of AAC, RHN CLAC's carry sub 200 LAC's that should mass around 30,000tons. _________
Tally Ho! Relax |
Top |
Re: Yet another (crazy) idea. | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Weird Harold
Posts: 4478
|
All we can really say is that RHN CLAC have around an average 200 LACs ready to launch. We can't say whether that is a readiness rate of 100% or only 80%. Given what we know of RHN maintenance, I kind of doubt that they run anything like 100% readiness. .
. . Answers! I got lots of answers! (Now if I could just find the right questions.) |
Top |
Re: Yet another (crazy) idea. | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Relax
Posts: 3230
|
Even incompetents at maintenance are going to be at 100% readiness for the biggest mother of all battles. _________
Tally Ho! Relax |
Top |
Re: Yet another (crazy) idea. | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Weird Harold
Posts: 4478
|
Not if they can't get the parts. If your LAC is going to turn into a ball of plasma if you try to fake it and light the fusion reactor without fixing it, you're not going to get any brownie points for being at 100% readiness. .
. . Answers! I got lots of answers! (Now if I could just find the right questions.) |
Top |
Re: Yet another (crazy) idea. | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Lord Skimper
Posts: 1736
|
I approve of this idea. Maybe we could call them Highlander 2's? Will have to use LERM or ERM missile if they are internally launched. Shrike varient LAC are about 5000 tons displacement. HoS is screwy when it comes to LAC mass. ________________________________________
Just don't ask what is in the protein bars. |
Top |
Re: Yet another (crazy) idea. | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Relax
Posts: 3230
|
They sat at whats it star before BOMA1 for how many weeks with a full fleet train... Don't be absurd _________
Tally Ho! Relax |
Top |
Re: Yet another (crazy) idea. | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Weird Harold
Posts: 4478
|
I spent 21 years in aircraft maintenance; the only thing absurd about this discussion is the concept of 100% readiness. There's always at least one "hanger queen" in any squadron of aircraft. .
. . Answers! I got lots of answers! (Now if I could just find the right questions.) |
Top |