


Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests
Star Ship Troopers | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
HB of CJ
Posts: 707
|
Regimental Drop Ships carrying...1000 Star Ship Troopers. Whoops...already been done. Sorry. HB of CJ (old coot)
![]() |
Top |
Re: "Marine Carrier" | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
TheMonster
Posts: 1168
|
Also, Talbot could be pronounced according to French orthography as "Tal-bow" (rhymes with "glow"), where RADM Pierre died, which helps to remember it's closer to Nouveau Paris. This confusion is due to DW not being one of those authors who adheres to the "One Steve Limit" trope. He even comments in one of the books about how many planets' capital cities are named "Landing" or "First Landing". That makes sense. How many US states have a "Springfield"? Of course there's a "Talbot" and a "Talbott". There's probably even a "Talbotte" out there somewhere for good measure. |
Top |
Re: "Marine Carrier" | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
SWM
Posts: 5928
|
Yeah, Talbot System and Talbott System are hardly the only points of confusion. There are several systems with identical names. In making my composite map (Almost ready to post the first public version!) I have found: Slocum System in Silesia and Slocum System in Haven, plus Stocum System in Haven which was misprinted as Slocum in early paperbacks. Hera System in Haven and Hera System in Silesia. Sasebo System in Haven and Sasebo System in the Solarian League. Casca System in Haven and Casca System in the old Manticoran Alliance (there's a big potential confusion!). --------------------------------------------
Librarian: The Original Search Engine |
Top |
Re: "Marine Carrier" | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
SharkHunter
Posts: 1608
|
No doubt there's a need for an all-up assault force carrier "ship class", but likely not for very many ships "in the class".
Given that any marine carrier" is only going to go in-system arrive after the RMN has thorougly smashed any "space going opp force", that's not what massive quantities of marines were generally on ship to be use for, though they're good at it also. Meanwhile, RMN marines help "fight the ships in local mode", do damage repair, and "boarding enemy ships", like pirates, etc. Plus -- other than bombarding a planet from space, an Honorverse no-no -- are the only way to take out uppity bad guys, minions and ravaging hordes of Bad Guys or hopped up natives hiding down there under the atmosphere. Any of the Marines are supposed to be pretty dang lethal. Thomas Theisman takes out St. Just's ground based forces with relatively few marines on a few assault shuttles with apparently mostly just State Sec casualties, because Capital Fleet already controls the orbitals. Honor's small force plus navy support stops an indigent invasion, etc., or the attack on Blackbird, the FAK, etc. Think about Thandi's first thoughts as a potential Torch CNO is how few SLN marines and supporting forces it would require to take out a whole planetary garrison without getting all the slaves on the planet suicide bomb style killed in the man time. So if your transport ship can't be attacked, in a circumstance where you needed say, twenty five hundred Marines, a single Atlas class passenger liner would do JUST fine for most operations. ---------------------
All my posts are YMMV, IMHO, and welcoming polite discussion, extension, and rebuttal. This is the HonorVerse, after all |
Top |
Re: "Marine Carrier" | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
JeffEngel
Posts: 2074
|
The final Junction terminus will go to the Talbottt Galaxy. ![]() |
Top |
Re: "Marine Carrier" | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
JeffEngel
Posts: 2074
|
I've been thinking the RMN may want to explore ways of carrying out the sticky personnel-intensive operations the new automation-heavy ships have such trouble with with more automation, or more broadly-trained crews, rather than grabbing back at more people.
I have no objection to getting more people back aboard - if the RMN can get them. Certainly Talbott and Silesian are potential new and copious sources of personnel, but they are also new and copious personnel sinks as much as their defense soaks up shipping. And beyond that, finding Talbotters with adequate educational backgrounds and Silesians with the combination of political/personal reliability and relevant professional training/experience would be tricky. How much in the way of search and rescue drones, inspection drones, SLN-surrender-accepting drones, and Navy ratings with enough exposure to Marine training and equipment could the RMN manage? And how far might it take them? I vaguely recall from "With One Stone" a modest ship-controlling device, and that was quite a few years before present. Something like that could jack down the warm bodies a prize crew would take. Small counter-grav drones - which may do double-duty as recon devices for ground combat situations - could flit about on S&R ops. With tractor beams, they may be able to clear wreckage out of the way, and do double-duty for damage control as well. Even if they're not brainy enough to do that on their own, they could do the searching and be remotely controlled by a human for the delicate work. That human could be monitoring a number of them, and step in to put a human mind or touch in the loop in sequence as any of them come up to a task that calls for that. Abigail Hearns' detachment liberating the captives at Saltash are at least an example of Naval ratings and equipment - under Mateo's supervision, at least - doing Marine work. They're clearly not ideal for it, but it's an example of fine making-do and maybe that making-do can be improved quite a bit, if the warm bodies and old-school Marine complements aren't in the cards. |
Top |
Re: "Marine Carrier" | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
saber964
Posts: 2423
|
More than that for the Atlas class IIRC RMMS Artemis could carry 5000 passengers plus crew. So if she was converted to a long haul troop transport you could effectively double or triple her troop carrying capacity. For example look at the RMS Queen Mary she carried 2100 passengers but during WWII as a troopship she could carry an entire infantry division of about 15-16,000 troops. |
Top |
Re: "Marine Carrier" | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Vince
Posts: 1574
|
If the limitation on passenger loads is room, yes. But if the limitation is life support, no. You can pack troops in like sardines and then tell them to deal with the cramped quarters for a while, but you can't tell them to stop breathing, drinking, eating or using the waste facilities. Keep in mind that terrestrial troop ships don't have to deal very much with life support on the open oceans. Fresh air (oxygen) is provided by the planet, drinking water is carried (or nowadays, distilled or created using reverse osmosis purification), food is carried for the short time it is needed unlike the Honorverse where rations may be needed for weeks or even months while a ship travels to its destination, and sewage can be discharged. Honorverse ships have to provide all the life support needed to support the crew and passengers or troops. Vacuum doesn't give you anything in the way of life support. -------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes. |
Top |
Re: "Marine Carrier" | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Jonathan_S
Posts: 9092
|
Totally agree. However I'd guess that as armed passenger carrier the Atlas liners are built with the possibility of battle damage involved. I'd be surprised if they didn't have significant redundancy in their life-support. Probably greater redundancy than even warships routinely have. (So as not to further risk the very expensive lives of their passengers should half (or more) of the life support plant suffer a mischief. So if pressed into service as a troop transport I'd expect they could handle at least 2 or 3 times the number of troops as they normally handled passengers. Now that's still far short of the ratio the big ocean liners could achieve when converted to troop carriers, but it's still and impressive number of troops. |
Top |
Re: "Marine Carrier" | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Vince
Posts: 1574
|
I don't think even the Atlas's could pack in 2 times their normal passenger load, let alone 3 times. Keep in mind that life support costs money, mass and volume to build and run for a passenger liner (civilian designed, built, owned and operated) in the Honorverse, so carrying 3 times the life support that you need for your normal crew complement and passenger load just doesn't make sense, when the odds are you will never use the ship to carry that big a load and therefore will never make the extra money spent back. The bean-counters (accountants and financial officers) would go nuts at the idea. Examining the life support from the PRN Longstop transport ships (which were designed from the outset as 'military' transports) suggests that passenger liners have about 20% extra life support capacity as a buffer in case something goes wrong: Italics are the author's, boldface text is my emphasis. -------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes. |
Top |