Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 69 guests

Favorite Honorverse Battle

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Favorite Honorverse Battle
Post by namelessfly   » Sat Feb 22, 2014 7:46 pm

namelessfly

roseandheather wrote:
namelessfly wrote:

You are just evaluating literature with your ovaries again.


Fortunately, my ovaries are excellent evaluators! :mrgreen:

(This coming from "give me all the shower scenes!" namelessfly? Pot. Kettle. Black. :lol: )



Sometimes ovaries can be excellent evaluators.

I loved the scene in the premier of the newer Battlestar Galactica series where President Rosalind is arguing Commander Adama about strategy.

President Rosalind was disrespected because she had become president only because she had been a former Kindergarten teacher politically appointed Secretary of Education who then became President only because all of the qualified people in the line of succession had died.

Adama wanted to rearm the Galactica then abandon the few survivors to go wage a brief, retaliatory, futile, suicidal battle against the Cylons.

President Rosalind explains, "This war is over. We lost. It is time to runaway and start making babies."

Absolutely brilliant thinking by the ovaries.
Top
Re: Favorite Honorverse Battle
Post by 61Cygni   » Sat Feb 22, 2014 8:25 pm

61Cygni
Commander

Posts: 162
Joined: Sun May 12, 2013 11:37 pm
Location: Wisconsin, USA

Fearless vs Thunder Of God, the ultimate Honor Harrington Deathride.

Monica was also great.

I agree, the single-ship or small-unit battles are far better than the later large-unit or mass-fleet actions. Those, while they can be humorous (The ISLN, hah ha) and ultimately have a satisfying result, seem straight out of a wargame (not surprising given David's involvement with Starfire/, with X number of ships and X number of missiles, then consult the statistics and probability tables for the results, with X number of missiles destroyed and X number of ships hit and X number of ships destroyed. Really, a big yawn. Those early small-scale battles, so reminiscent of Age Of Sail actions, define the Honorverse.
Top
Re: Favorite Honorverse Battle
Post by NortonIDaughter   » Sun Feb 23, 2014 4:53 am

NortonIDaughter
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 265
Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 12:09 am

Your niece is evil. How do you pick just one?????

Do coup attempts count?

If not, then... umm... either Blackbird, Solon or Basilisk (Lady Harrington and no mercy!)
Top
Re: Favorite Honorverse Battle
Post by Highlander1960   » Sun Feb 23, 2014 5:12 am

Highlander1960
Lieutenant (Senior Grade)

Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2013 6:08 am
Location: Inverness, Scotland

cthia wrote:
Crown Loyalist wrote:
And no, she's not interested in the military as a career. She wants to be a physicist. The particle accelerator at CERN is all she talks about. She goes so far as to view it via Google Earth all the time.
.


Well someone has to invent the warp drive.. :D
Top
Re: Favorite Honorverse Battle
Post by mark   » Sun Feb 23, 2014 10:00 am

mark
Lieutenant (Senior Grade)

Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 3:16 pm
Location: The Netherlands

cthia wrote:
And no, she's not interested in the military as a career. She wants to be a physicist. The particle accelerator at CERN is all she talks about. She goes so far as to view it via Google Earth all the time.

I assume she knows that they speak french there? And, does she? Learning an extra language can be something nice to spend a bunch of time on, instead of showing the easy (and, by now for her, quite boring) trick of being able to go through a school year in half the time. Also, the feynman lectures (http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/ are a nice, relaxing way to spend the odd afternoon, as, probably, http://qcraft.org/ (I haven't tried it, but I've heard that it's interesting)
Top
Re: Favorite Honorverse Battle
Post by Amaroq   » Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:37 am

Amaroq
Captain of the List

Posts: 523
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 4:39 pm
Location: Princess Anne, Maryland

roseandheather wrote:
Crown Loyalist wrote:I started reading these books when I was twelve, so I believe it. And at the time, the most recent book that'd been released was Echoes of Honor, and I recall being pretty well blown away by Cerberus myself.

In terms of my favorite battles, though, I think I'd have to go with First Hancock. Followed by Third Yeltsin. And I really enjoyed Oversteegen squashing four pirate heavy cruisers, but we didn't really see much of that bout.

I prefer the smaller engagements to the massive fleet engagements, and I prefer engagements pre-SD(P)s.


Tiberian. Gauntlet. Michael Oversteegen.

*dramatic swoon*


I would've loved to have gotten to read more of the actual naval battle in that one. However, having Gauntlet come out of nowhere in a Big Damn Heroes (http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/BigDamnHeroes) moment like that was something else.
*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
In War: Resolution. In Defeat: Defiance. In Victory: Magnanimity. In Peace: Goodwill.
Top
Re: Favorite Honorverse Battle
Post by namelessfly   » Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:42 am

namelessfly

NortonIDaughter wrote:Your niece is evil. How do you pick just one?????

Do coup attempts count?

If not, then... umm... either Blackbird, Solon or Basilisk (Lady Harrington and no mercy!)



First Yelstin, Fearless vs Thunder of God was my favorite.

Then came the battle of Monica where Abby Hearnes invented the trick of using FTL com sensor data from recon drones to enhance control of LS linked Mk-16s. Abby had never heard of Apollo, yet she had this insight. Of course lingering images of Abby from the shower scene in IN THE SERVICE OF THE SWORD enhanced my appreciation of the action.
Top
Re: Favorite Honorverse Battle
Post by Werrf   » Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:45 am

Werrf
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1549
Joined: Thu May 12, 2011 7:47 am
Location: Cleveland, OH

Aside from the heartbreaking death of "Froggie" Hall, I'm going to have to go with Second Hancock. The first hint of what the new weapons mix could really do, and the real triumph of Honor's combining the Jeune Ecole weapons with traditionalist thinking.
Top
Re: Favorite Honorverse Battle
Post by Amaroq   » Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:59 am

Amaroq
Captain of the List

Posts: 523
Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2014 4:39 pm
Location: Princess Anne, Maryland

namelessfly wrote:I still say that the battle ofCerbus was predicated onthepeeps sufferringfrom a severe cranial-rectal insertion. How else can you not see a fusion rocket accelerating a one million ton BC at over 100,000 gees.

The Peeps could not see a rocket exhaust that was 200 times brighter than a planet.


It was less they couldn't see it coming as they weren't paying attention to what they were seeing. Honor explains it thus in EoH:

With no impeller signature, a ship might as well be invisible at any sort of extended range.

On the scale to which God built star systems, active sensors had a limited range at the best of times. Officially, most navies normally monitored a million-kilometer bubble with their search radar. In fact, most sensor techs—even in the RMN—didn't bother with active sensors at all at ranges much above a half-million kilometers. There was no real point, since getting a useful return off anything much smaller than a superdreadnought was exceedingly difficult at greater ranges. Worse, virtually all warships incorporated stealth materials into their basic hull matrices. That made them far smaller radar targets than, say, some big, fat merchantman when their drives were down . . . and when their drives were up, there was no reason to look for them on active, anyway, since passive sensors—and especially gravitic sensors—had enormously greater range and resolution. Of course, they couldn't pick up anything that wasn't emitting, but that was seldom a problem. After all, any ship coming in under power would have to have its wedge up, wouldn't it?

But Honor's ships didn't have impeller signatures.


And Mike offers her two-cents on the sensor question in AoV:

"The next weakness was that her plan counted on the Peeps' sensor techs to be effectively blind. By using thrusters, she avoided the sensors which most tactical officers tend to rely upon—the Peeps' gravitics—but she was mother naked to everything else in their sensor suites. In fairness—" Henke's tone turned judicious, her expression serious, though her eyes twinkled at Honor "—it was reasonable enough to at least hope the Peeps, who don't usually maintain as close a sensor watch as we do, wouldn't think to look for her in the first place, but if they had looked, they would have found her.

"In line with the second weakness," the captain continued, "was the fact that even though a reaction thruster approach allowed her to avoid the enemy's gravitics, the plume of ejecta it produced must have been quite spectacular . . . and energetic, and Peep stealth fields, which were what Her Grace had to work with herself, you will recall, aren't as good as ours. Again, Her Grace had taken the precaution of placing herself with the local star at her back. Had she not possessed 'inside information' on Peep movement patterns at Cerberus, she would have been unable to do that, of course. In this case, as she mentioned, she knew her enemy's probable approach vector well in advance, which let her give herself the advantage of attacking 'out of the sun,' as it were. If the enemy had failed to appear where she anticipated him, the entire maneuver would have been out of the question, and I'm certain she had a more, ah, conventional fallback plan for that situation. As it was, however, Cerberus-A's emissions were sufficiently powerful to greatly reduce the effectiveness of any sensor looking directly at it, and by the time Her Grace's vector had moved her clear of the star, she'd shut down her thrusters and other active emissions. Nonetheless, the circumstances only made it difficult for the Peeps to have picked up her approach; they didn't make it impossible, and an alert sensor crew could have given the enemy warning in plenty of time.


Sorry for the giant blocks of quotes but I think both were needed to adequately answer your question. As Honor says, "Surprise is usually what happens when someone misinterprets something he's seen all along."
Last edited by Amaroq on Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
In War: Resolution. In Defeat: Defiance. In Victory: Magnanimity. In Peace: Goodwill.
Top
Re: Favorite Honorverse Battle
Post by Kysterick   » Sun Feb 23, 2014 12:01 pm

Kysterick
Midshipman

Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2014 11:41 am
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana, USA

cthia wrote:Oops, I forgot. Now she has given me homework.
She keeps reading about the similarities of Honor to Horatio Hornblower.

To be honest I've never read it. So my niece insists that we read it together! But I think it's a series. So she's asking big bucks.

What can I say but to acquiesce, gees!


I have to agree with your niece on reading Hornblower, excellent series and author to read.

For my favorite, at the moment I would say First Yeltsin; Due to small scale combat(much more personal), Honor asking for the music as it commenced, and I think it is one of the better representations of who Honor is.
Top

Return to Honorverse