tlb wrote:If you prefer explosions and deaths, that is up to you. Obviously the author felt that the Malign would also prefer explosions and deaths. I have only been saying that it was not a necessity.
As for people questioning and looking, that is happening anyway. The explosions did not stop anything.
PS: The existence of the Malign was known to the most important people affected and that knowledge is spreading. The explosions did not cover that up either.
penny wrote:I don't know what you think I've got to do with it, but I don't think he preferred deaths. He preferred "no loose ends." Death was simply a way to manage that.
Sure. People are looking. But those people will have to look without the benefit of those "loose ends." The best way to ensure a total wrap up of loose ends is an extinction level event.
Also, being that Houdini was so rushed and ahead of schedule, Detweiler could not afford to risk defection, resistance to ones responsibilities or leaks because of emotional baggage. Emotional baggage is what created Simoes.
People thought they had the time to do a lot of sentimental things on their to do list. Detweiler could not trust people to do the right thing and leave all of their "pets" and petpeeves behind.
Eliminating loose ends is a way of preventing many more deaths in the future by being found.
If everyone on the list had their genetic nanotech treatment, then anyone who attempted defection would die when they could not get their next scheduled reset treatment.
Albrecht preferred explosions and deaths to ensure no loose ends and send a message. You agreed that his option would leave fewer loose ends than the option I suggested, that is a choice you made.
Do you really think that an "extinction level event" would be best to eliminate loose ends? On the other hand, if you believe that "Death was simply a way to manage" problems (instead of the ONLY way), then perhaps you can agree that there were other ways to expedite Houdini with a much smaller death toll.