cthia wrote:That is exactly my niece's point.
Remember, the older college students were trying to browbeat my 12-yr-old niece for not wanting to place Hamish so high on her list. And my niece became exasperated with them.
When I asked her why she thought so little of Hamish's skills, she explained it to me at point-blank range.
What stuck out so brightly was her notion that "Hamish should not be given Apollo to finish his drive towards Noveau Paris, because he can never truly appreciate Apollo. Honor should do it!"
It made sense to me. She said she'd rather have Alice Truman if Honor wasn't available.
I'm still a little confused. Hamish's drive on Haven was about 7 years before Apollo was invented. He couldn't have been given Apollo to finish his drive because it didn't exist.
In fact we never got to see how good a tactician he might (or might not) be in the era of podlaying MDM combat. While he was serving the GA had a monopoly on that and everybody else in the galaxy was hopelessly outclassed and you don't need any particular tactical acumen to win when you can hit harder than anybody else and do so from beyond their weapons range. But by the time podlayers went to war against each other he was already out of the navy; and so never led MDM equipped SD(P)s against similarly equipped enemy ships.
Then by the time Apollo did exist Hamish was already retired from the navy and serving as the civilian First Lord of the Admiralty -- so not only was Hamish not leading a drive towards Noveau Paris he wasn't even in the navy anymore; and so couldn't take over the Apollo equipped 8th from from Honor even if he'd wanted to. (Nor was Manticore in a position at that time for anybody to try to make a drive towards the Republic's capital)
So I'm confused as to what your niece was saying - because "Hamish should not be given Apollo to finish his drive towards Noveau Paris, because he can never truly appreciate Apollo." seem to significantly confuse the timeline.